|
Post by Mistress Quill on Mar 19, 2009 7:02:58 GMT -5
Okay, so yeah it's a little different for sure. Dracula never sparkled. But, what do you think about the new vamp development? Is it cool that Vampires sparkle in the book? Or would you rather they didn't? Keep it friendly please.
|
|
|
Post by LadyMia on Apr 2, 2009 10:15:51 GMT -5
I think it's a pretty cool explanation for why they can't go in to the sun, well at least in public. Now they can still go in the sun when they're alone. It's like the perfect combination between the traditonal vampire and the 'modern vampire'.
|
|
|
Post by Cris? on Apr 8, 2009 11:09:10 GMT -5
In the movie it looked rather disturbing...but I liked the way Stephenie wrote it. So, it's 50/50
|
|
|
Post by TailsDoll450 on Apr 24, 2009 14:11:01 GMT -5
Well Im on 50/50 with the sparkle and disenegration. I like the sparkle cause now I know they won't die in sunlight and I like disenegration cause I like it when they're like, "Ahhhhh! I'm melting!!!
|
|
|
Post by irinadenali on Apr 24, 2009 19:50:47 GMT -5
HA ha you have that right. But, there is 1 thing I don't like about it, it's the disintegration I mean it is completely pointless.
|
|
|
Post by blatant0axolotl on Nov 29, 2009 18:41:40 GMT -5
it's completely stupid. thy aren't really vampires then. more like fairies. plus no fangs, nothing that makes a vampire a vampire besides the drinking blood.
|
|
|
Post by lestat4206 on Jun 7, 2010 11:55:53 GMT -5
its ok i guess. something different from the same old cliche vampire thing. i think its just kinda another way to project vampires as a good and glorified creature in her books rather than an evil one
|
|